Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Kaippallil

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:48, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

John Kaippallil

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable actor--only minor roles. DGG ( talk ) 16:44, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per DGG. He may be attractive (ahem) but his roles have been so minor that they only have one name. What's with that? According to an August 2016 article in the the Deccan Chronicle, he's had only "one good role". I found some mentions in sources, but they are not what you'd call significant. Maybe it's just too soon. Bearian (talk) 20:36, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:11, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:11, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- no indications of notability or significance per available sources and does not meet WP:ACTOR. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:52, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: It is WP:TOOSOON for him. As of now he appears to have only one major act, but is likely to be a notable actor when he appears in more films. Anup [Talk] 00:06, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.