Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Robbie Cup

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:25, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Robbie Cup[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced, stat-only page about a minor event. The best source I found is [1], but WP:NOTNEWS, WP:NEVENT, etc. Is this rescuable? Or merge/redirectable? Note: I am nominating this here after a request at pl wikipedia's AfD at pl:Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/artykuły/2023:08:19:Puchar Chicago 1992, where a number of similar weak articles were nominated, and several have English Wikipedia entries (but very poor, as the one seen herel the two others that may merit discussion on English Wikipedia are Umbro Cup and 1985 Azteca 2000 Tournament). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 00:42, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports, Football, and United States of America. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 00:42, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:14, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:39, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete doesn't meet WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:21, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.