Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jill Tracy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz Read! Talk! 05:18, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jill Tracy[edit]

Jill Tracy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable performer. I can't find any album reviews or mentions of anything she's performed in. Appears PROMO. Gsearch is straight to this wiki, then her social media. Oaktree b (talk) 17:29, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:40, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Seems to meet WP:BASIC. Article needs some cleanup but it's not so far gone as many. Here's what I have so far, independent research:
    1. Sigcov in background outside of non-independent attributed statements and quotes: (>200 words of once non-independent is filetered out) [1]
    2. More Sigcov in background outside of non-independent attributed staements and quotes. (>350 words once non-independent stuff is filtered out) [2]
    3. Abstract here has 150 words of sigcov, article will almost certainly have more. [3]
    4. Allmusic staff album review with sigcov of artist [4]
siroχo 02:34, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. SPA-created fanpage or perhaps vanity bio from early days of WP. 128.252.154.2 (talk) 19:21, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   ArcAngel   (talk) 01:22, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep because the subject meets Wikipedia:Notability. Regarding PROMO, this alone is not valid reason for deletion due to Wikipedia:AFDISNOTCLEANUP, if WP:NBASIC is still met. I believe it is, as significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources exists. Here is a source assessment table:
Source assessment table: prepared by User:IAmHuitzilopochtli
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
San Francisco Examiner (https://www.proquest.com/docview/270492916/D4F41F16E6BF4B8CPQ/2?accountid=196403)
Yes Story is written by a journalist at the San Francisco Examiner based on several interviews and original reporting. The journalist draws his own conclusions and makes independent observations.
Yes The source follows established journalistic standards and is a reliable source.
Yes The entire article is focused on Jill Tracy. Yes
Orange County Register (https://www.ocregister.com/2023/02/14/how-jill-tracy-found-inspiration-in-the-spiritualist-retreat-of-lily-dale/)
Yes Independent media organization
Yes Reliable newspaper
Yes The entire article is dedicated to Jill. Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.
IAmHuitzilopochtli (talk) 19:03, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep in view of the significant coverage in multiple reliable sources such as The San Francisco Examiner, Orange County Register, and AllMusic staff written bio, so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 22:01, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Due to the sources mentioned by IAmHuitzilopochtli and Atlantic306. MrsSnoozyTurtle 05:53, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.