Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeanne Kalogridis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:47, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jeanne Kalogridis[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG IW. (talk) 22:37, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. IW. (talk) 22:37, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. IW. (talk) 22:37, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete article has no reliable sources behind it.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:07, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and speedy close per WP:COMPETENCE. Kalogridis is a well-known and widely reviewed writer. Even a cursory check reveals, for example, four reviews in the current decade at Kirkus, nine at Publisher's Weekly, several at Library Journal, about twenty in various SFFH genre publications, and even a favorable piece in the New York Times Book Review. Google Scholar shows that her works are frequently discussed in academic publications and regarded as substantial. It is painfully apparent that neither the nominator nor the delete !voter have made the slightest effort to actually evaluate the actual notability of this author. Their efforts damage this encyclopedia. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. Fight for freedom, stand with Hong Kong! (talk) 21:31, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:55, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the reviews at Publishers Weekly and others cited by Hullaballoo. — Toughpigs (talk) 06:49, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Hullaballoo's arguments. Caro7200 (talk) 12:38, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, meets WP:NAUTHOR, works are "well known", entering her name in WorldCat reveals her books are held in 100s of libraries, plus their are also numerous reviews of them, thanks to Hullaballoo Wolfowitz above for mentioning these. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:49, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.