Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeaneen Carlino

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:02, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jeaneen Carlino[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was deleted through prod last year, so cannot prod. Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass GNG, and does not meet NARTIST. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:41, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:41, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and California. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:42, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no sources found, nothing in Jstor, Gnews only has a few listings where her art has appeared. Oaktree b (talk) 19:11, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete another "Chicana Latina Art and Artists student submission" that remains on the course list even though it is WP:TOOSOON. see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Yesenia Alvarado (2nd nomination) If AlmaLopezGDA is going to continue teaching this class they should PLEASE take note of these deletions-- WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 02:32, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I believe sources are adequate; they may not be top-flight, however.Mwinog2777 (talk) 19:52, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:13, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as all of the sources cited are written by the subject (e.g. self-submitted "artist profiles"), or are Q&A type interviews with her on blogs. There are no secondary sources here, and no reviews of her work in independent, reliable sources. As such, it's not much different from a CV. Agree that it is WP:TOOSOON for a standalone Wikipedia article focused on the artist. If the artist herself or someone closely associated with her is reading this, I would strongly advise reading WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY, which explains why autobiographies and CVs are not allowed on Wikipedia, and why you may actually not want to have a Wikipedia article in the first place. Cielquiparle (talk) 14:39, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I also checked ProQuest, and only found one brief mention about an event she attended. Cielquiparle (talk) 14:41, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.