Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janimation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:23, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Janimation[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As Vegantics said, this article has almost no notability, and does not cite many sources. It may also have a COI with the articles major contributors, like Farix said. JazzyRightdoer (talk) 07:56, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation, Companies, and Texas. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:18, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Seems like a case of industry notability, but without some reliable sources it may not be possible to verify. The existing magazine sources seem like industry periodicals that rely on interviews, so it's hard to verifiably determine the contribution to these major works. A single source that's not an interview would really help. —siro χ o 08:40, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I did a fair amount of digging when I initially proposed this page for deletion and could not find significant coverage in multiple sources-- the majority of citations mention Janimation's work on notable productions but do not convey notability to the business itself. Additionally, the article creator was almost certainly a paid consultant (see my follow-up comment on the Talk page) and the previous deletion was reversed by JaniOctopus, whose user name is a direct reference to the company and who has not made any effort to improve the page since having the deletion reversed (all to say, I strongly suspect ongoing COI). Vegantics (talk) 19:13, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.