Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Christopher

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:43, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jamie Christopher

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFILM and WP:NOTINHERITED, and death doesn't establish notability. All sources are simply parroting his death announcement and involvement in two mega-franchises (Harry Potter and Marvel) with no noteworthy individual accomplishments. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 16:45, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and England. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:08, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep. What is currently on the page attests notability: 3 reliable independent in-depth sources about him. And a brief internet search shows plenty of other sources. He is clearly notable. Also notable as creative professional for his noted contributions to extremely notable films, as the said sources prove.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 23:29, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep I believe he does meet notability guidelines, but the article definitely needs expanding. Rusted AutoParts 22:36, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:47, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:23, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Death generally doesn't establish notability, but notability can become apparent upon death. There is a lot of coverage of this individual that appeared upon their death, not for their death but for their work. So I believe WP:BASIC is met. Side note, I am not sure if WP:CREATIVE applies to technical roles like assistant director, which is a confusingly named non-creative role in filmmaking. —siro χ o 03:08, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.