Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamelia Malteser
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedily deleted per WP:CSD#A7 by NawlinWiki. Arkyan • (talk) 06:50, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Jamelia Malteser[edit]
- Jamelia Malteser (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Fails to meet notability guidelines. There are five articles linked together and to nothing else that seem to share this lack of notability. Namely Jamelia Malteser, Graham Harrington, Inzmam Ulhaq, Bea Williams and Take Me Back. They all seem edited only by two users, Ford_Prefect_2 and Beachw. Thiste 20:24, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Google search for "Jamelia Sandosam Malteser" -wikipedia and "Jamelia S Malteser" -wikipedia and "Jamelia Malteser" -wikipedia all got absolute zero entries. (Search for merely "Malteser" would drown in refs to the UK make of chocolate.) The page's external links section says that she appears in http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0364270/, but http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0364270/ does not seem to mention her. Anthony Appleyard 20:32, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No sources cited to establish notability. I suspect this is part of a hoax, along with the linked articles. EALacey 21:49, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as hoax, per my comments on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bea Williams. —Celithemis 01:45, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete. Thiste 01:48, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a hoax. Claims of her appearance in the Australian headlines are false (but then, so are the claims made about the other linked articles). BigHaz - Schreit mich an 08:50, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.