Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Izabela Kisio-Skorupa (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:46, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Izabela Kisio-Skorupa

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability, she's just a minor Internet "celeb" known to only a small number of people, even Polish Wikipedia deleted an "article" about her because it only contained references to gossip sites, just like here. Chomczurek065 (talk) 20:54, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article is well-written, full of correctly assigned references and covers the well-known person of the online culture, especially among the youth, still mentioned by important media figures like Kuba Wojewódzki or Karolina Korwin-Piotrkowska, both journalists. Kisio-Skorupa not only is an inspiring actress and already a singer with more and more songs released digitally, but also a personality with the history of oft-discussed controversies. There is absolutely no reason to delete that article apart from your personal disgust with the questionable, but undeniable phenomenon of such people like her, Paris Hilton or Tiffany Pollard. Greetings, Ciastkoo (talk) 11:56, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PS. Unfunny didn't laught. Try harder.

But in case you're gonna come up with something equally dumb: "because it only contained references to gossip sites, just like here". Here's the main argument. Stop littering Wikipedia with "joke" articles, nobody finds it funny. Kk? Chomczurek065 (talk) 15:26, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Poland. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:02, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Bands and musicians, and Businesspeople. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:25, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 20:20, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing for notability found, most sources are red-highlighted per sourcebot. I can't find sources we can use. Oaktree b (talk) 22:03, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I agree with Ciastkoo. Kamdenek (talk) 20:10, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, a source review would be helpful as it's claimed that the sources used in this article are "gossip sites", hence unreliable by Wikipedia standards.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:58, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

None of the sources provided are "gossip sites" per se, and if there any dubious ones provided, seeing that there are twenty seven ones provided, from an article in a Polish news magazine Wprost to an episode of TVN series or Spotify music releases, if need be, some parts of the text shall be removed or reorganised instead of deleting the whole article. Ciastkoo (talk) 13:57, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No claim to notability. The one paragraph mention in the weekly Wprost (2014) concludes (in Polish), For now, Mrs. Kisio-Skorupa has gone to gossip portals, but something tells me that in a moment she will end up like Trybson on the couch at Wojewódzki. Or on Dancing with the Stars. I feel very sorry for Ola. Really. All fluff trying to make herself a celebrity. --Bejnar (talk) 19:05, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Oaktree's analysis. ArcAngel (talk) 05:49, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.