Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Italia Rugby Football League

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 08:11, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Italia Rugby Football League[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not the official Italian Rugby league (the real is the FIRL - Federation Italia Rugby league - affiliated members of the RLIF) this is a rebel organisation that isn't recognised by the Rugby league International Federation. C0c0nutzg (talk) 02:09, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 03:28, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 03:28, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:14, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Are you implying this fails WP:GNG? SportingFlyer talk 21:18, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Being a "rebel" league isn't grounds for deletion. Smartyllama (talk) 16:49, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 02:16, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Being a "rebel organization" isn't a valid ground for deletion. But failure to meet the GNG IS one. No refs that aren't primary here, where are the sources? Nha Trang ^Allons! 19:32, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep We are not here to establish the legitimacy of an organisation, but whether it is notable. Given that there are coverage of the league [1][2][3][4][5], it should qualify under WP:GNG. Hzh (talk) 15:11, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 21:20, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:58, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.