Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isín

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 20:24, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Isín[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Merge into Sabiñánigo. WP:GEOLAND give the presumption of notability but a presumption is not a guarantee even if WP:RS do actually exist. Per WP:N: ""Presumed" means that significant coverage in reliable sources creates an assumption, not a guarantee, that a subject merits its own article. A more in-depth discussion might conclude that the topic actually should not have a stand-alone article." WP:NOTEVERYTHING: "Information should not be included in this encyclopedia solely because it is true or useful." // Timothy :: talk 08:41, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per above: A locality or neighborhood is not automatically notable, and the Sabiñanigo municipality is the legally recognized populated place with significant coverage. Reywas92^Talk 06:34, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There are already a large number of stub articles orientated around settlements of similar population and size within municipalities. If Isín is to be merged, then they should too, e.g. Bellara. For clarification, Isín is not a neighbourhood of Sabiñánigo, it could be better rephrased as a village. A deletion would be justifiable due to WP:NOTEVERYTHING, but not merged because it would require for a significant number of articles to be too. Castilruiz (talk) 07:46, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 08:41, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:31, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep Per WP:GEOLAND. "Sabiñanigo municipality is the legally recognized populated place" What does this even mean? Isín is a unidad poblacional of the municipality (INE 005500) [1]. It has even an entry in the Madoz dictionary (Volume IX, page 458). We cannot pretend that there are no "legally recognized populated places" below the municipality level. That's a travesty. PS: Ffs, it was even a municipality before the 1857 census [2].--Asqueladd (talk) 13:57, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.