Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ipsito Das (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I'm going to hold off on the salting for now. If somebody wants to go down that path, pursuing a topic ban might be a possibility. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:38, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ipsito Das[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A previous page on this person was deleted at AfD in 2013, with another instance deleted as CSD G4 shortly afterwards. The sources in this latest version are also poor: largely WP:UGC sites, some self-referential such as on the FStoppers portfolio where he is described as an " IMDB recognised professional Fashion Photographer". The closest to substantial coverage may be the MyFashion19 item: "To rebrand her-self she communicates to International Fashion Photographer Ipsito Das known as master of rebranding in fashion industry. Who has already covered several fashion shows like MBFW, Victoria’s Secret for several fashion magazines."; that may help verify the subject as a working photographer, but neither that nor anything else appears to indicate WP:CREATIVE notability. AllyD (talk) 21:14, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 21:17, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 21:17, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. His own "about us" (plural) page reads in its entirety "Ipsito Das is IMDB recognised professional Fashion Photographer was born in Kolkata in 1985. Born and bought up in family where culture was nurtured in painting,". Really, if this is all he can say about themself, I can't be bothered to explore what might have been overlooked for this WP article. I realize that this is a lazy way to approach an AfD and therefore am putting this on my watch list and am open to persuasion that I'm utterly wrong about him/them. -- Hoary (talk) 00:30, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I request this article to be "CONSIDERED" as well --Adrtii loghania (talk) 07:22, 22 February 2018 (UTC):Ipsito Das (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)- (<\include>Wikipedia:Ipsito Das Thank for revision of the article. This article contain much of the reliable source link which is WP:NEWSORG sites should be treated as valid resource. valid references sites are here under :WP:CREATIVE. We have http://www.ftkindia.com is a news website under category WP:NEWSORG. another reference http://www.myfashion19.com/ipsito-das-fashion-photographers-terns-magazine-publisher/ website under category WP:NEWSORG Kindly let us know even in those two are website under category WP:NEWSORG what could be the reason for deletion. I also found several News Organisation published news.[reply]

Delete and ideally salt. The editor has in the past inserted the photographer's name in articles of several fashion shows when there are hundreds of them doing the same job and aren't mentioned. MT Train^Discuss 07:34, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.