Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inverzia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:13, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Inverzia[edit]
- Inverzia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not pass WP:ALBUM: album was released by non-notable band. (Wikipedia does not have an article for the band) Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:04, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:43, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Slovakia-related deletion discussions. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:44, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm adding the article "Stanem sa", a single from this album, to this nomination. It asserts to having the most expensive music video made in Slovakia, but I've not been able to verify this. Thryduulf (talk) 09:46, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete album and single. No evidence of notability for either. Thryduulf (talk) 09:46, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both album and single "Stanem sa" pages as fail WP:NALBUMS and eligible for speedy deletion under criterion A9. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaela den (talk • contribs)
- Comment. A9 requires both that the band have no article, and that the article about the musical recording make no claim to significance. The article about the single claims it's significance and so A9 is not applicable. This AfD about the album had already been started when I became aware of the article. Thryduulf (talk) 11:14, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both, the album as nom and single per Thryduulf. Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:51, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both, not notable. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 13:18, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both per WP:NMUSIC. If the band isn't notable enough to survive a prod (it expired over a year ago), the band's music definitely isn't. Erpert Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it? 23:34, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete both per WP:SPEEDY#A9 as musical recording where the artist's article does not exist. Hekerui (talk) 15:04, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.