Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Pool Tour
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. J04n(talk page) 11:22, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- International Pool Tour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
"Notability is not temporary" - This article is about an event that pretty much went belly-up its first year, and was gone by its third. No encyclopedic value. MSJapan (talk) 18:55, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. czar · · 20:22, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. czar · · 20:22, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep As the nominator says, "notability is not temporary". This was clearly notable in 2005, so it's notable today. Dricherby (talk) 22:11, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Dricherby. — Joaquin008 (talk) 14:25, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The top pool players in the world played in it... that would make it a top tier competition and notable. Again, notability is not temporary and it seemed notable then. Mkdwtalk 07:03, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.