Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Insane Championship Wrestling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Yash^talk stalk 05:49, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Insane Championship Wrestling

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable wrestling promotion. Appears to be sourced by primary sources and social media. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 14:59, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:22, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:22, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article quality is low, but I see no reason to delete the article. Power~enwiki (talk) 19:42, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - meets WP:GNG. Significant coverage as demonstrated by: Vice Magazine [1]. The Fight Network [2]. BBC [3] and [4]. The Independent [5]. Huffington Post [6]. Plus some other local coverage already in article. Sources from 2012 to present, including from Canada and UK. Nikki♥311 20:05, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Having received enough coverage over the past few years, this meets WP:SIGCOV requirements.LM2000 (talk) 21:35, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep echoing other comments, this one is notable. Article may not be good but that is not a deletion criteria. MPJ-DK 10:44, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I hate to be unoriginal, but it's all already been said. JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:39, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes gng Chetsford (talk) 19:08, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Meets GNG. --Guy Macon (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.