Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Innodata

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The article has been reverted to the 2014 version which is significantly different than the version nominated for deletion. Please re-nominate should you feel it's still a candidate for deletion. Nakon 23:02, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Innodata[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

corporate promo and advertising The Banner talk 23:04, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Innodata for the corporate response to this AfD. The Banner talk 10:37, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Revert to 2014 version before spamming by the company marketing department. . . Mean as custard (talk) 11:18, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Revert, as suggested by Mean as custard. Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service! Pyrop e 18:09, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:55, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:55, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:55, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:55, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Mean as custard - please link the version you are referring to. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 06:25, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This version: [1]. . .Mean as custard (talk) 07:35, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep but neutralize, the article has been reverted as proposed by Mean as custard, there is enough sourced information from independent sources to keep it, but I think that there is still promotional unsourced information that needs trimming. I will add some citation needed tags to the article.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 15:35, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I have added the tags and removed much of the promotional and superfluous content.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 19:16, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.