Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indoor Rules

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -Scottywong | comment _ 18:49, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Indoor Rules[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find any independent reliable sources that give in-depth coverage to this spin-off of Aussie rules, so I don't believe it passes the general notability guideline. Jenks24 (talk) 03:21, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Jenks24 (talk) 03:22, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Jenks24 (talk) 03:22, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:17, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge very selectively to Variations of Australian rules football. The-Pope (talk) 17:25, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Seems reasonable, but there's actually no referenced content to merge. Maybe just a redirect? Jenks24 (talk) 04:42, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →B music ian 00:39, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unsourced (WP:V), not mentioned at the putative redirect target. Sandstein 06:07, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.