Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/India under-19 cricket team in England in 2017

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh 666 19:07, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

India under-19 cricket team in England in 2017[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per previous consensus on a very similar article that fails to meet the notability threshold for cricket. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 10:38, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 10:39, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 10:39, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 10:39, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:39, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom as the matches are not first-class and, therefore, the tour fails WP:CRIN. Jack | ^{talk page} 11:45, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:50, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that to delete this article because the page creator of the article India under-19 cricket team in England in 2017 has provided the scorecard of the first ODI match between India and Australia [1]. On the other hand, I assume that the article may be created due to patriotism. Abishe (talk) 09:14, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete U-19 cricket tours aren't notable. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:44, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.