Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Incisive Media (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. seresin | wasn't he just...? 05:09, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Incisive Media[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Incisive Media (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article fails WP:NOTABILITY, WP:NOT, WP:SPAM and WP:COI. Article was created by an WP:SPA account with no other edits other than related to Incisive Media. Was speedied under WP:CSD#G11. Self-promotion and product placement are not the routes to having an encyclopaedia article. Hu12 (talk) 17:56, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Rewrite though. Over 92 Financial Times hits [1] Computerjoe's talk 22:32, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - notable company, enough sources are available. Article needs to be rewritten though. --Snigbrook (talk) 22:46, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ➨ REDVEЯS dreamt about you last night 22:49, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per notability, 1,110,000 ghits. Clearly in need of expansion and assertion of notability. Billscottbob (talk) 23:43, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Well done SEO is now a measure of WP:NOTABILITY ?--Hu12 (talk) 23:54, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge or redirect to Apax Partners. There's not much actual content here, so a merge or redirect to the parent company seems to be the right editorial course. If someone adds enough verifiable content justifying a separate article, it can always be spun out later.--Kubigula (talk) 03:36, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.