Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iman Gadzhi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎ . Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:02, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Iman Gadzhi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable influencer. Forbes contributor pieces and other paid PR items, also a crypto "marketer". Not meeting GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 16:57, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Internet, Russia, and United Kingdom. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:57, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete crypto spam - David Gerard (talk) 19:36, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
crypto spam ?? There's only one line about crypto on this article.... CassiJevenn (talk) 18:00, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: BLP, fails GNG and BIO. Sources in article are interviews and promotional. BEFORE showed nothing that meets SIGCOV from IS RS addressing the subject directly and indepth. WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"'; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy (WP:V and WP:BLP) and guidelines (WP:BIO and WP:IS, WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV). // Timothy :: talk
Delete The sourcing is indeed dubious, and I can't find anything better. Girth Summit _(blether) 14:56, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.