Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IFT Research & Development Award

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. —Tom Morris (talk) 00:09, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

IFT Research & Development Award[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Listed in the Institute article as one of the awards, but I couldn't find any secondary coverage of the award itself. All the past winners are redlinked. Bbb23 (talk) 18:51, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:19, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, does not seem to be particularly notable. A Google search returns only this article, mirrors thereof, directory style entries and a handful of CVs, nothing that I'd describe as comprehensive or substantial. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 10:33, 27 February 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 22:11, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.