Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'll Be Here All Night

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 19:54, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll Be Here All Night

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film. Proposed deletion template removed by the article's author (also, self-admittedly, the film's producer (see Talk:I'll Be Here All Night)) WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:04, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, and speedy if there's an appropriate criterion, as non-existent crystal ball gazing. QU ^TalkQu 14:13, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no evidence of notability. --Kinu ^t/_c 15:08, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now per TOOSOON. The now-blocked author states "a film that I am currently looking into producing", which indicates this article being premature. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 02:14, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - When googled, few results where there but none were notable. The film isn't notable nor is the production house or any one associated. It fails WP:GNG. →TSU ^tp* 17:11, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per statemens written above. --Hahc21 ^{[TALK][CONTRIBS]} 20:25, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NYF--Ðℬig XЯaɣ 10:36, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.