Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hypoxico, Inc.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 03:04, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hypoxico, Inc.[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:CORP and reads like an advertisement. This article should never have made it out of AfC, and appears to have been approved/moved to mainspace by someone misusing the script. Seahorseruler ^{(Talk Page) (Contribs)} 05:10, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:40, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:40, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

comment None of the sources given, aside from patents (which do not establish notability), mention Hypoxico at all, so as is the article does not meet GNG or CORP. I tried to find a few sources, the best I come up with is [1], [2], [3], [4], [5] (a press release). 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 21:26, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 17:26, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No real evidence of notability. Sources often make no reference at all to the subject of the article. -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:38, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- Somedifferentstuff (talk) 22:38, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - zero reliable secondary sources (patents are primary and no, Fox Sports doesn't count as reliable). Bearian (talk) 22:18, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.