Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hume Building Products

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio$ ^{Let's talk about it!} 20:41, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hume Building Products[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:CORPDEPTH not met. References are to their own website, trivial mentions, or are promotional. power~enwiki (π, ν) 14:54, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I was in the middle of doing this when I got distracted. Let me add that current article leans in the promotional/advertising direction despite some improvements. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:00, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 15:49, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 15:49, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

keep. The article is no more "promotional" than similar articles for related companies like Boral. External citations are from solid sources - eg aoweibang.com article is not at all "in passing", AFR notes it is a "growing company" etc. SGREditor (talk) 23:12, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete being a growing company is not a criteria for notability per WP:NCORP - every company is growing in their press releases that are churned or in random listings. Run of the mill company with no significant coverage and analysis Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:22, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and per Galobtter. There's no evidence that this firm is notable for Wikipedia's purposes. Nick-D (talk) 08:22, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.