Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugo Schwyzer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wifione ^Message 16:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hugo Schwyzer[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This BLP apparently asserts the subject's notability as a writer and a professor. The subject is clearly a prolific writer about himself, sex, and feminism, mostly in the blogosphere, but fails to as to WP:BASIC substantial coverage by multiple independent reliable third parties to show significance as a writer or professor. He unambiguously fails the notability requisites that seem most applicable – WP:WRITER – and the alternate WP:ANYBIO. The subject is also on this side of stellar as to WP:PROFESSOR. JFHJr (㊟) 01:15, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. After doing a search, I just added one short paragraph to the article about Schwyzer being banned from a feminist blog. At least it was reported in a real secondary source (the Atlantic), as opposed to self-reported. Even with that addition, although the guy gets a lot of notoriety, I don't see any real notability, as an author, a teacher, or a commentator.--Bbb23 (talk) 03:14, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I am familiar with his work, and was not expecting to vote delete on this AfD, but after a pretty thorough search for sources, I haven't found any besides the atlantic article that meet our standards. 98.248.194.216 (talk) 08:21, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: "He has also written of the many times he has had sexual encounters with his students, including a class trip he was charged with chaperoning in which he had sex with four of his students." What? This is legit?--Milowent • ^hasspoken 05:31, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. No BLP issues here. It's a large part of what has made him a controversial figure - he's written about that and more in his personal blog, and in articles he's published elsewhere. 98.248.194.216 (talk) 06:26, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, possible speedy G10. The combination of primary sources cherry-picked to show the subject in a bad light (however much he may deserve it) looks like a BLP violation to me. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:25, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.