Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Howl from Beyond the Fog

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I have to disregard what Eiga-Kevin2 wrote, and the sources found by BuySomeApples have been found to be wanting in the subsequent discussion with arguments that have remained uncontested. Sandstein 15:13, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Howl from Beyond the Fog[edit]

Howl from Beyond the Fog (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was deleted with the rationale, "Decline PROD, several sources already cited", and no improvement. However, the sources are simple blurbs, listings, or mere mentions. Searches did not turn up enough to show it passes WP:GNG, and it doesn't meet WP:NFILM. Onel5969 TT me 02:31, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I disagree. It's just you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eiga-Kevin2 (talkcontribs) 02:36, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Link20XX (talk) 03:09, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Link20XX (talk) 03:09, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Link20XX (talk) 03:09, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:50, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep passes WP:GNG per the sources listed above as well as another by Dread Central and one from Scified. Delete does not pass WP:GNG. TipsyElephant (talk) 03:45, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - just a few things, Scified is not a reliable source (it's based on fan input); the Dread Central piece is advertising, not an actual article (you can tell because it promotes the sale of the DVD), the OurCulture piece is yet another short blurb. The link to Robert Hood, is to his blog, which is not necessarily a reliable source, and the link simply mentions the short film and is about something else entirely. So all-in-all, there's zero in-depth coverage of this short film. Onel5969 TT me 14:02, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Onel5969: yeah, you're right. Sorry, I totally missed that. It doesn't appear that there is a great redirect target either. I'm switching my conclusion to delete. TipsyElephant (talk) 18:53, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 12:45, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.