Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Houston–Texas football rivalry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 12:31, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Houston–Texas football rivalry[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnecessary content fork of the Houston and Texas football teams. Relative to other rivalries and rivalry articles, this has no trophy, fewer contests, and less rivalry-specific coverage. p b p 14:57, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:32, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:32, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:33, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Purplebackpack89: A prior AfD closed only six weeks ago. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Houston-Texas football rivalry. Is there a reason this is being brought back to AfD so quickly? Cbl62 (talk) 17:54, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It was closed as no consensus, so there's no prejudice against it being renominated. p b p 22:40, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that, but six weeks is a bit quick. And you did not link to the prior AfD, so I thought you might have been unaware. Could you go ahead and add the link in the AfD box above? Cbl62 (talk) 00:38, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Two months is generally accepted per WP:RENOM, so it is slightly speedy, and Cbl62 is correct in noting the AfD hasn't been properly created (losing the reference to the previous one.) SportingFlyer talk 09:18, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@SportingFlyer: The reason I didn't find the previous AfD is that the article was renamed since the previous AfD. The claim that this hasn't been properly created is off. Anyway, can we not get so hung up in bureaucracy and address the fact that this is not a notable rivalry? p b p 14:50, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dom from Paris (talk) 14:47, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:42, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no sources in the article indicate that this is a rivalry.-UCO2009bluejay (talk) 18:34, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no evidence this particular pairing of football teams is particularly notable. Otherwise, if a competition has n teams, we'd be creating (n*(n-1))/2 articles for every possible pairing of teams. "Rivalry" articles should only exist if the pairing is demonstrated to somehow be noteworthy. SJK (talk) 09:51, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.