Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hops Sportswear

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Falls far short of notability requirements, and no independent sources. — Coren ^(talk) 00:18, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hops Sportswear[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable comapny and brand. Essentially spam. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 21:52, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (could have been speedied under db-comp) Non-notable, only refs are to a YouTube clip and the company's own website. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 13:15, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
STRONG Delete should have been speedied, not notable --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 23:18, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. I agree. Tried that. So now we waste our time here.... -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 06:26, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A relatively new company that isn't yet notable. Stowonthewolder (talk) 16:52, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:43, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:43, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:11, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete blatantly fails WP:CORP. LibStar (talk) 00:43, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.