Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homifax

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:02, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Homifax[edit]

Homifax (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionable notability Amigao (talk) 18:16, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: Frankly I think this comes very close to qualifying for speedy deletion under WP:G11.
AntiDionysius (talk) 18:19, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Promotional article, cites are a collection of press releases and apparent paid content. The article author did the bare minimum to get autoconfirmed by copy and pasting ChatGPT output into articles. This is a likely case of undisclosed paid editing. - MrOllie (talk) 18:32, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I removed the blackhat SEO and junk blogs. Nothing else comes up in searches, other than SEO from the usual places. Sam Kuru (talk) 14:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.