Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hoddywell Archery Park

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 23:43, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hoddywell Archery Park[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable spam article. Article creator User:Peter Kaltenbrunner is named in article as one of the founders of the company. Text mostly lifted and marginally rewritten from company's website, probably a WP:PARAPHRASE. TransporterMan (TALK) 18:02, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages because also created by the same creator and part of plan of spam; Hoddys Well might remain if some evidence of its existence other than this company's site is found:

Delete: Subject appears to fail WP:GNG. Topher385 (talk) 17:44, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:20, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete All - A walled garden of articles, all lacking WP:RS to support WP:GNG, created by a WP:SPA with WP:COI in support of each other. Happy Editing! — 70.21.24.28 (talk · contribs) _{22:14, 11 August 2011 (UTC)}[reply]
Delete all clear WP:ADVERT and conflict of interest. LibStar (talk) 12:33, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.