Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ho-Chunk Casino

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) LlamaAl (talk) 00:02, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ho-Chunk Casino

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. No sources. DegenFarang (talk) 23:36, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect Redirect to the Ho Chunk article. There are citations refering to the casino in the Ho Chunk article including the various locations the casino is located-thank you-RFD (talk) 14:31, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect. I support the re-direct. DegenFarang (talk) 00:13, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and trout slap the above editor! Having an article without a large number of citations is not a reason to delete. Exactly why is this casino not notable? Vegaswikian (talk) 23:45, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment-I just added information and citation to the Ho-Chunk article about the Beloit Common Council selling additional land to the Ho-Chunk Nation for a proposed casino. I would support keeping the Ho-Chunk Casino if someone would rewrite the article with citations and keeping the promotional/advertising wording out of it. It appears the Ho-Chunk Casino is one of Wisconsin's major industries and therefore notable. One has to take account the vote of the Beloit Comon Council to sell addtional lands to the Ho-Chunks for a proposed casino-Thank you-RFD (talk) 12:35, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Plentiful sources are available to satisfy GNG ([1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]), which nom probably didn't bother to look for because this is a bad-faith nom borne out of his unrelated dispute with the article's creator. Toohool (talk) 15:53, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This AFD was never properly listed. I have added it to the log on 18:38, 20 February 2013 (UTC).—Ryulong (琉竜) 18:38, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The Wisconsin Dells casino claims to have over 2200 slot machines alone.[13] There appear to be six current locations, five of which aren't mentioned for some reason. Anyway, there are newspaper stories dating back to the 1990s. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:14, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:07, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:07, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep , this article is one of a series of bad faith nominations by a indef blocked editor. [14] ▪◦▪≡SiREX≡^Talk 00:00, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.