Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of Koothattukulam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:25, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

History of Koothattukulam[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article without any sources since its creation. I've been looking for both online and offline sources, but haven't found anything. It's true accuracy is in question and no editors has shown interest in fixing the issue. Thilsebatti (talk) 11:11, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Thilsebatti (talk) 11:11, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:33, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

*Redirect to Koothattukulam until a properly-sourced article is written.Mccapra (talk) 11:59, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Completely unsourced. Right now this is a completely unneeded "history of" CFORK from the stub Koothattukulam. Since none of the material is sourced, merge is not a valid AtD. Redirect is a very unlikely search term and the primary already appears, but no objection if someone feels strongly. // Timothy :: talk 01:54, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as TimothyBlue argues. Mccapra (talk) 20:17, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.