Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hilton San Francisco Financial District

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 10:22, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hilton San Francisco Financial District (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not meet GNG or NBUILD. Sources in the article are mentions or brief directory style entries (or the subject's website). BEFORE showed nothing that meets IS RS SIGCOV that addresses the subject directly and in depth. The article makes no claim for it being notable.   // Timothy :: talk  20:02, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy :: talk  20:02, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy :: talk  20:02, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I live in SF and even I think this is unnecessary. All primary or nonviable sources (save for an 1897 NY Times article). Pretty much everywhere out here has served as a filming location at some point, so it's certainly not notable in that regard. sixtynine • whaddya want? • 23:25, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:46, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.