Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/High Commission of India, Gaborone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Botswana–India relations. After two relistings, it seems that consensus is to merge. (non-admin closure) Ifnord (talk) 20:52, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

High Commission of India, Gaborone

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. All this article does is confirm the high commission/embassy exists and who the high commissioner/ambassador is. Embassies/high commissions are not inherently notable. LibStar (talk) 22:46, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:12, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:12, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 23:51, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:51, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no notability independent of the relations page. Geschichte (talk) 06:46, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – the user states it to pass GNG test. But I am in favour of merging it with either the Botswana–India relations or to the List of diplomatic missions of India. But please, [atleast] don't remove it. Utkarsh555 (talk) 14:13, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

which "user states it to pass GNG test"? No one has said in this AfD that it passes the GNG test. LibStar (talk) 02:08, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@User:AbhiSuryawanshi states it so. Utkarsh555 (talk) 07:07, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@LibStar why not considering it to merge and have a redirect to either the list or the relations? Utkarsh555 (talk) 07:09, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 🌀Locomotive207-talk🌀 01:47, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I think that while an embassy might be a possible search term, a high commission is not. Geschichte (talk) 17:44, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:30, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge it with either "List of diplomatic missions of India" or to Botswana–India relations; BUT PLEASE NEVER DELETE ANY INDIAN EMBASSY ARTICLE! Utkarsh555 (talk) 11:59, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I presume you're changing your !vote from Keep to Merge? LibStar (talk) 01:31, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well yes, but actually no.😁 Utkarsh555 (talk) 12:19, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok ,I am changing my vote. MERGE Utkarsh555 (talk) 12:20, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Botswana–India relations: This is useful information. A Merge target exist. Overtime if and when it becomes notable, a page can be created. Venkat TL (talk) 13:54, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.