Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hersi Ally Said

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus to delete with clear assessment of sources showing gng is not met. Fenix down (talk) 15:08, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hersi Ally Said[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Accomplished, but not enough in-depth coverage included currently, or found through searches to pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:01, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 14:21, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 14:21, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 14:21, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 14:24, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 14:36, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don’t see anything in-depth to support this BLP. Mccapra (talk) 14:53, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This article looks likes it only needs to be re written, because the topic has multiple link sources (notable) to support it from searching engines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.222.181.33 (talk) 16:17, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This exists only to promote its subject and has no apparent significant coverage in WP:RS. The above comment does not appear factually accurate from my search; all I see are passing mentions. FalconK (talk) 06:46, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. 1.WWW.Goal.com, www.sportsleo.com, and www.swahili.crni.in All of this site are reliable sources, and its not only mentions. This article lack to be re written proffessional, WP:BP, WP:SP. 4realtz (talk) 07:43, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Are you sure the coverage cited is significant and independent? Let's break it down in the source assess table. Merely being quoted in the press a bit about your job doesn't make you notable. FalconK (talk) 02:38, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
Source assessment table: prepared by User:Falcon Kirtaran
https://sportsleosw.com/tag/hersi-said/	The only article in the list just quotes him	?	This is not actually a proper citation to an article, it's a link to the news source's tag on his name containing exactly one article	✘ No
https://bisonews.cd/tag/said-hersi-ally/			Mis-cite as above, but the article doesn't provide anything in-depth. It's short, and describes I think the drafting of two players into a football club he owns? So not really about him.	✘ No
https://www.goal.com/en-tza/news/gsm-explains-concept-behind-yanga-scs-new-202021-jersey/mjhqozxmbzng17j7iwaonfz2a#:~:text=Yanga%20SC%27s%20partner%20GSM%27s%20investment,concepts%20ahead%20of%20every%20season.	The article relies on Said as a source		The article is documenting the jerseys of his football club, not him	✘ No
http://www.kinondonimc.go.tz/new/rc-makonda-azindua-jengo-la-upasuaji-mwananyamala-lililogharimu-takriban-milioni-420-hadi-kukamilika-kwake			The article is not about him at all and is a mis-cite. It doesn't even state the fact it's being cited for; he's quoted, so it's a mention in passing	✘ No
http://swahili.cri.cn/141/2019/02/22/1s183013.htm		? Government-sponsored news source China Radio International	The article documents that he is the chair of a committee for the Taifa Stars but it is a mention in passing. It might be usable to cite that he was on the committee but I don't even know what the cited sentence is supposed to mean.	✘ No
https://www.newsbreak.com/news/2043518403050/hersi-said-not-easy-for-yanga-sc-to-sign-kisinda-and-tonombe	The cited sentence is biased, and it's inappropriate to cite people's words about themselves as fact.		The article is not about Said. It merely quotes him talking about drafting a couple footballers.	✘ No
https://www.ippmedia.com/en/sport/tff-appoints-%E2%80%98big-wigs%E2%80%99%C2%A0-steer-taifa-stars%C2%A0%C2%A0			The article points out that he and someone else took a job, and that's it. We do not generally view these kinds of routine announcements as significant coverage.	✘ No
http://www.dsm.go.tz/storage/app/uploads/public/5a6/a0d/8cc/5a6a0d8cc3c76484560649.pdf	? This is a government press release	?	Hersi is mentioned in passing to reference what he said about his business.	✘ No
https://www.eatv.tv/news/sport/eng-hersi-wa-gsm-atuma-ujumbe-mzito-yanga-sc	The article relies on the subject's instagram page as a source		This is again only a report about something he said, not actually coverage of him	✘ No
https://www.udakuspecially.com/2020/08/harmonize-atua-rasmi-yanga-akutana-na.html	?	?	? I really can't tell quite exactly what this is without speaking Swahili but it appears to be coverage of something other than him, and he appears in passing	? Unknown
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Delete per above RedPatchBoy (talk) 13:16, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.