Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heartland Alliance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Either in draft space or in article space, but keep either way Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:19, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Heartland Alliance[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject only mentioned in passing in reliable sources. Meatsgains^(talk) 01:54, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:57, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify Google News shows dozens of potential sources, though not all are substantial. The article does not at present show the notability , so it should be incubated in Draft. DGG ( talk ) 16:42, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Organization is notable as shown by the economist and things like [1] (which ebsco thinks is peer reviewed) and ongoing news coverage like [2] . With the exception of perhaps too much detail in 2nd and 3rd sentences does not have promotional issues that would warrant taking out of mainspace (e.g. DGG's suggestion of draftify) let alone delete. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:13, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:28, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.