Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hatem Adar
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 16:28, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hatem Adar[edit]
- Hatem Adar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacks substantial coverage in RSs. Zero gnews hits. Zero RS gbooks hits. Zero refs in the article. My understanding is that placing 10th in a version of Pop Idol does not in itself confer notability. Epeefleche (talk) 01:39, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:15, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:15, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:15, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:26, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Winning would have tipped me, maybe even placing, but 10th is a no-brainer. --Ifnord (talk) 04:25, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as above. We could debate about whether contest winners deserve articles, but 10th place finishers? No. Not covered in reliable sources to boot. Nwlaw63 (talk) 19:51, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom and foregoing. Couldn't say it better. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 13:40, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.