Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hampden Academy (Newfoundland and Labrador)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 15:32, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hampden Academy (Newfoundland and Labrador)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable school or relevant in any way.--UserNL2020 (talk) 04:02, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 04:15, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 04:16, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 04:17, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: 90% of the schools on Wikipedia aren't notable but they still have articles..I don't think the notability rules apply to schools. I think we should keep this as a stub.

See: WP:DIRECTORY, there are hundreds of schools in this district and the majority are rural with no notability outside the local community.--UserNL2020 (talk) 02:59, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the sourcing is not enough to show notability. If 90% of articles on schools in Wikipedia are on non-notable institutions, we need to delete that 90% of articles, not keep every single article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:19, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per my standards; nonetheless I would not oppose a merger to the appropriate target (town or district). Bearian (talk) 21:31, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 15:54, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NSCHOOL / (WP:ORGCRIT). Subject lacks WP:IS WP:RS WP:SIGCOV that address the subject directly and in-depth. There is basic, run of the mill, routine, normal, coverage. // Timothy :: talk 08:34, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.