Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamilton–Rosberg rivalry

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:09, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hamilton–Rosberg rivalry[edit]

Hamilton–Rosberg rivalry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability. Rivalries between sports personalities happen all the time and this one lasted a relatively short period of time with recent articles about "making up", etc. Probably better placed to write a few sentences in each individual's article, if this is even relevant with the 10-year test of notability. Jake Brockman (talk) 18:41, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:12, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Not a notable topic for an article. Could potentially be mentioned in the articles about the individuals, if it is sufficiently relevant in the context of their careers. --RL0919 (talk) 04:35, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. – Sabbatino (talk) 09:22, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Also per nom. Doesn't have the long-standing nature of sporting rivalries which do have articles. E.g. football rivalries sometimes up to 100 years in existence. Not even particularly significant in F1 terms; just a series of spats between teammates (not uncommon). Eagleash (talk) 10:01, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - This does not match up to the guidelines about actual notable rivalries like, say Yankees-Dodgers rivalry, and was too short to remain relevant.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 20:50, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.