Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haitham Kassem

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:07, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Haitham Kassem[edit]

Haitham Kassem (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NSOLDIER   // Timothy :: talk  18:00, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy :: talk  18:00, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:13, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Yemen-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:13, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG. Mztourist (talk) 08:24, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I have done a search in Arabic and found that there is a lot of coverage of Haitham Kassem al-Tahir who is a former defence minister and who is still very active and is definitely notable. He has an ar.wiki article with no English equivalent. It seems he is so well-known that he is sometimes referred to just as Haitham al=Kassem rather than with his full name. However I'm pretty sure that the subject of this stub article is not the same person. Of the two sources in the current article one looks like it's dead and the other is just a passing mention. All of the other hits I've got in my search are to the former defence minister and not to this guy, so I think it's safe to conclude he's not notable. Mccapra (talk) 10:54, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.