Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Habib Noor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. all — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:59, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Habib Noor[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

On a living Guantanamo prisoner with no independent coverage at all. No Secondary source to claim notability. Fails WP:BLP1E, WP:BIO, WP:GNG. The citations used are primary sources (WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 84#Reliability of US military summary reports)

I am also nominating the following related pages because these articles are on the same topic and have the same issues as mentioned above. (Note I have already followed WP:BEFORE for these articles and nominating them after being fully convinced) :

The consensus on recent similar AfDs [1] [2] [3] was Delete DBig Xray 07:40, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete these people are not notable enough to warrant seperate articles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:57, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 23:28, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 23:28, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 23:28, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 23:28, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails the notability guidelines. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 10:58, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all - Standard WP:BLP1E fail, some sources discuss unfair detention but we're still squarely in 1event territory. Tarc (talk) 23:46, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.