Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greystone (comics)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE, due to very weak secondary references. Notability is questionable if the only sources are the source material and websites dedicated to the source material. Larry V (talk | e-mail) 05:25, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Greystone (comics)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Comic character article that is all plot and not sourced to any reliable sources to prove notability. Doesn't seem to pass the general notability guidelines, let alone the guidelines for fiction. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:03, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into List of minor Marvel Comics characters. Thanks, Starblueheather (talk) 15:12, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per nomination. The fictional character does not meet the general notability guideline and the content is a plot-only description of a fictional work. I do not think that a merge is deserved since the character is quite obscure, even for a minor character, and the article has no references, so any content could only be provided by interpreting primary sources with original research by synthesis or would come from unreliable sources as the ones in the external links. Jfgslo (talk) 16:33, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Starblueleather. BOZ (talk) 17:45, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Starblueleather and BOZ.--Crazy runner (talk) 06:33, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There does not seem to be any secondary source, so merging is not appropriate. --Crusio (talk) 12:07, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]