Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grenfell Regional Health Services Board

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:09, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Grenfell Regional Health Services Board[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating for procedural reasons, minimal sourcing and I am not sure it meets WIKI:GNG--IMR2000 (talk) 03:08, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness, Organizations, and Canada. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:01, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Could this be merged into a historical section of Health regions of Canada? Rathfelder (talk) 22:04, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm all for merging when there is meaningful content backed by sources, but this appears to be part of a chain of unsourced stubs about historical health services jurisdictions (including the very similar Health Labrador Corporation) which is neither here nor there. Health regions of Canada is also almost completely unsourced. Cielquiparle (talk) 04:45, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Like Cielquiparle, I'd be fine with merging if there were actually anything of substance to say and source about this, but there's not much point in adding a "historical" section listing defunct former health boards to Health regions of Canada (which is itself deeply inadequate deletion bait in its own right) if there's absolutely no evidence of the information's significance. Bearcat (talk) 17:36, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per above.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.