Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gray Routes

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2017 April 10.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:50, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gray Routes[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is nothing here to write about this one. Only promotional purposes such article even created. No notability. Light2021 (talk) 08:03, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and several things to note: 1 is that we can never confide in Indian news media, especially the questionable ones, because we have in fact established there's blatant "pay-for" methods of publishing articles, including of which is simply republished company advertising, complete with finance specifics and customer-counting, but also the fact there's no set establishment of accepting genuine news.

Another, is the fact it's a newly started company and the only account involved here has been the one advertising-only account, see here who has literally only focused with this one advertisement; another is the sheer fact this blatant advertisement was specifically formattted to make it seem as if "information and sources" were enough alone, when we all know it is not. When we start making compromises and unconvincing "but republished advertising means something!", we're damned as an encyclopedia, because it would show we can't even handle the simplest of advertisements. SwisterTwister talk 20:14, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:40, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:40, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- "minor tech startup" spam. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:40, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:54, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:54, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Lacks kind of coverage Wikipedia seeks for a company article. Anup [Talk] 21:49, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.