Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golden Swing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:51, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Golden Swing

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A it's unsourced. B it's just as notable as anyother mini swingn and there for does not need a separate article. For example you don't see an article about the Australian Open Series (comprises of 3 tournaments) nor the British Grass court swing comprising of 3-4 tournies depending on how you see it KnowIG (talk) 23:59, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Added references to the article. I think the Golden Swing is different from the other two swings/circuits you mention here. The Golden Swing aren't four seperate tournaments (as for example the British Grass court tournaments). The four tournaments were explicitly linked as a four tournament-circuit by the ATP in 2001 (see the first reference). StephanQz (talk) 00:56, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

But so is Brisbane, Hobart Sydney and Melbourne by the Australian Open series coined by Tennis Australia. And that like this swing it is not a separate race like the US Open series (where a money/points race happens). AO series does not have an article and is explictly linked so I was wondering what others thought of this page. KnowIG (talk) 01:04, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I get your point. The reason why I added this article is because in the last few weeks I read in different media things like "Almagro can be the first player in history to win three Golden Swing-tournaments". Similar articles appeared last season when Juan Carlos Ferrero could win three of the four tournaments. I never read anything similar about the Australian tournaments. That's why I think it's useful to keep this article, since it gives a quick overview of all the (multiple) winners since the circuit started in 2001. — Preceding unsigned comment added by StephanQz (talk • contribs) 01:19, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The point can also be made about the Asian swing as well. But as I said I want to know what others think. As your view point is/was obvious before I start this (no offense). KnowIG (talk) 09:05, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:02, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:42, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The ATP also calls it the Golden Swing so it is kind of notable of an own article. Kante4 (talk) 02:21, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think TBF that was already established. KnowIG (talk) 08:57, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per Kante4--REMEMBER C ^M O 02:27, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.