Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goc-ong

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:12, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Goc-ong[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Whilst there are certainly a decent number of people that possess this surname, none of them currently have Wikipedia articles, so this can't be turned into a disambiguation page for them. In terms of reliable sources discussing this surname in depth to show a passing of WP:GNG, I couldn't find any and none are presented in the article. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:32, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:33, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, poorly written dab. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 11:35, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
~~Redirect~~ to Danieca Arregaldo Goc-ong. Fails WP:GNG with insufficient coverage of the name. Only one Wikipedia article with person of this name, so name list doesn't make sense. Consistent with {{R from surname}}.—Bagumba (talk) 08:24, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Bagumba: I think Danieca Arregaldo Goc-ong was deleted or something. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 10:40, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It seems to have gotten moved to Draft:Danieca Arreglado Goc-ong.—Bagumba (talk) 10:47, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Is the subject considered notable just for being viral once (or maybe even a few times only) because of her TikTok videos? HiwilmsTalk 18:33, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete if there are no bios on WP w/ this name. The name itself does not meet GNG.—Bagumba (talk) 10:47, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: Would call a WP:G14 on this one. "Regardless of title, disambiguation pages that disambiguate zero extant Wikipedia pages." HiwilmsTalk 18:28, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per above reason. Slovenichibo (talk) 05:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.4meter4 (talk) 04:19, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as WP:G14 per Hiwilms. Chirota (talk) 05:06, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:54, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.