Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goalzz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:34, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Goalzz[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has been tagged for a year for lack of notability and lack of third party sources, and no improvements have been made since. The only references and external links provided are only to the site the article is about, and thus fails WP:RS. Although it makes claim of notability by saying it is the "Leading sports site in the Middle East", no references exist to support this, and I can find none elsewhere, thus the article most likely fails WP:N. Rorshacma (talk) 18:47, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 19:48, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:55, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 14:46, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:51, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - after over 6 years of editing football articles on here, I can confirm it's a site of questionable reliability and doubtful notability. Giant Snowman 21:55, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Cloudz 679 13:04, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nom. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.