Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Professional Basketball League (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  15:04, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Global Professional Basketball League[edit]

Global Professional Basketball League (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Proposed basketball league that never played a game. The same issues exist today that existed when the article was last put to AfD. LionMans Account (talk) 18:20, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 04:28, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 04:29, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:01, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am also nominating the following related pages because they're two teams also in this league:
Lancaster Liberty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
North Jersey Runnin' Regulators (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

LionMans Account (talk) 15:40, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all per nom. They fail GNG. Jrcla2 (talk) 20:10, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 03:10, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all Fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG, lacks significant coverage in independent sources. Sports leagues and teams are not automatically notable, they need to have independent sources covering them with non-WP:ROUTINE coverage.—Bagumba (talk) 08:11, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per nom and following rationale. Rikster2 (talk) 12:45, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all Fails GG and ORG. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 11:40, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all as per nom and above editors. Search resulted in a single brief mention in an article from 2010. Onel5969 TT me 13:01, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.