Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girl2K

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seems no real argument this passes NFILMS and that is the standard we apply. if you think my reading of this in the discussion raise a thread on my talkpage. Spartaz ^Humbug! 22:10, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Girl2K

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

too soon, short article and need more reference PradaSaetiew (talk) 21:46, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 June 20. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:59, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 22:21, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 22:21, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP - short article and needing more references aren't really the strongest arguments. It appears to be a reasonably popular (upcoming) show in Thailand. That said, I cannot find sufficient evidence to meet WP:NFILM, but I note that many sources may be in Thai. I think some input from WikiProject Thailand may be of help here. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 22:31, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*Comment: Too soon and not Notability.--PradaSaetiew (talk) 09:51, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:32, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:10, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: It was established at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friend Zone 2: Dangerous Area that nobody actually knows the premiere date for this show, or the others nominated with the same rationale. The only real rationale given is TOOSOON, but the nominator doesn't know how soon it will actually be. "Short article" and "Not notability" are not acceptable rationales. Keep on all of these thoughtless nominations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Toughpigs (talk • contribs) 14:25, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 13:34, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per the lack of sourcing. Which I think is 100% valid because the notability guidelines for films requires in-depth reviews. Which this doesn't have and there's no telling that it will. My is it won't because it like a run of the mill film.It's not like the article can't be recreated later when or if it has them though. I don't think "other AfDs exist" by the keep voter is valid either. Especially when that AfD isn't done yet. --Adamant1 (talk) 17:06, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as what I already mentioned in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friend Zone 2: Dangerous Area previously. — Emperork (talk) 19:32, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.