Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gilad Lehmann

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:14, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gilad Lehmann

CV of a non-notable Ph.D. student, failing WP:ACADEMIC. Wasn't sure if I could make a case for speedy as A7 so brought here first. KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:17, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:21, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:21, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As per nom, also, I'm assuming that if Lehmann were truly notable, he would have had a German wiki page, which certainly isn't sidebar linked if it exists. Fol de rol troll (talk) 14:35, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I agree that this subject seems not to be notable by English Wikipedia standards, but why should the non-existence of an article in German Wikipedia about an Israeli subject have any relevance to this discussion? Phil Bridger (talk) 21:09, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. None at all. I could have sworn I read that Lehmann was at a German University on the article. Maybe I'm losing my marbles. Oh dear. Either way, I still say Delete.Fol de rol troll (talk) 21:40, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Watch out for those marbles - they roll away even faster as you get older ;) Phil Bridger (talk) 22:21, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete for lack of notability. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:09, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable, search doesn't indicate notability either. Hekerui (talk) 18:13, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - Does not meet basic notability standards. Tiptoety ^talk 22:24, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Snowball delete. I think the mention of a scientific discovery makes A7 speedy deletion problematic, but this isn't even close to passing WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:49, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Passes neither WP:PROF nor WP:BIO.--Eric Yurken (talk) 01:53, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, has a few papers with a few citations, but nowhere near enough to get to WP:PROF. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 13:49, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete in concurrence with the above commentators – summary: the article is little more than a recitation of this guy's college career thus far. He may become notable someday, but certainly is not at the moment. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 15:21, 23 April 2009 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.